The 1987 film “Robocop” was a massive hit, earning rave reviews from both audiences and critics. Even today, it continues to be highly regarded. With a 92% rating from critics and 84% from audiences on Rotten Tomatoes, it’s clear that the original film made a lasting impact. However, the 2014 remake by Jose Padilla took a different approach to the iconic character, receiving a lukewarm reception despite a star-studded cast and a fresh take on the story.
Notably, the original director, Paul Verhoeven, expressed his dissatisfaction with the remake in a recent interview. He pointed out that the new version lacked the “beautiful” element that made the 1987 film a masterpiece. Verhoeven highlighted the difference in the portrayal of the main character, emphasizing that the original Robocop’s lack of awareness about his past added depth to the story, a crucial aspect that was missing in the 2014 film.
“The problem was that [in the 2014 film] Robocop was fully aware that he had lost his legs and arms. He knew it from the beginning. In the original, the most beautiful thing that makes him something bigger than just a tragedy, is that he [Robocop] still doesn’t know anything.”
Verhoeven’s insight sheds light on the fundamental differences between the two films, with the original offering a more nuanced and compelling portrayal of the iconic character. Even Joel Kinnaman, who starred in the remake, acknowledged that the film did not fully capture the essence of the original, suggesting that it may have been better received under a different title.
Another point of contention for viewers was the disparity in age ratings between the two films, with the original’s R rating contrasting with the PG-13 rating of the remake. This difference likely contributed to the varying reception of the two films, further highlighting the challenges of remaking a beloved classic.
Source from www.playground.ru