No 10 suggests upgrading Lucy Letby inquiry to compel witnesses

No 10 suggests upgrading Lucy Letby inquiry to compel witnesses

The official inquiry into the murders committed by Lucy ⁢Letby⁢ could be upgraded to compel witnesses to give ​evidence, Downing Street has indicated.

Rishi ⁤Sunak has come under‍ growing pressure from victims’ families and experts who want the investigation⁣ strengthened to become a statutory inquiry, giving its chair full legal powers to summon witnesses.

The prime minister, on a ​visit in North‍ Yorkshire on⁤ Monday,⁣ refused to be drawn‌ on‍ the ‍issue, saying his priority was that the ⁢families got answers “as quickly ⁤as possible” and that lessons were learned ⁢from failings around the case.

But the Guardian understands that No 10 is⁢ open to the idea of a statutory inquiry after Letby was handed a​ whole-life prison sentence for the murders of seven babies in her care at the Countess of Chester hospital and the attempted murders of six more.

The government has been under growing pressure⁤ to rethink its approach to the inquiry into events at the hospital’s neonatal unit between 2015 and 2016, launched last week‍ on a non-statutory ⁢basis amid concerns that a statutory investigation could drag on.

Dr Dewi​ Evans, the prosecution’s lead medical expert in the ⁢Letby trial, told ‍the Guardian: “A non-statutory inquiry ⁤is a complete waste of time and money and it should be statutory where⁢ it is public and people are required to give evidence​ on oath.

“Anything else⁣ is a waste ‍of time and money. It’s indicative of⁢ the government wanting to be seen to be doing something instead of actually doing something that could lead to significant changes.”

The former chief nursing officer, Dame Christine Beasley, told the BBC: “I think what a statutory inquiry will do is compel people to come and give evidence where in an independent inquiry people can opt out of it if they want to.

“So I really understand parents and families wanting to make sure ‍we get to the bottom of whatever‍ happened there so that we can actually learn.

“I would go down on the side of a statutory inquiry would be better because whatever‌ the outcome of the independent inquiry is, I feel that relatives and patients will not feel that they’ve got to the bottom of it.”

The Labour leader, Keir Starmer, ‌told Sky News: “It has to be a statutory inquiry. I don’t think that needs to hold things​ up. We could get on with that⁤ very quickly.”

The Department for Health originally launched a non-statutory inquiry in the belief ⁢that it would be quicker. However, the prime minister’s official spokesman said on Monday that the government had not ruled ⁣out ‌holding‍ a statutory inquiry.

He added: “We are focused on the ⁤outcomes.‌ The most important thing⁢ is to make‌ sure ⁢families get the answers they need and that it’s possible​ to learn the lessons, that it’s done transparently and that it happens as quickly as possible.

“That’s crucial. And obviously, we will have an inquiry on ⁤the right footing to achieve ⁢that.”

On his visit‍ to a nursery school, Sunak told reporters: “I think the important…

2023-08-21 12:10:27
Source from www.theguardian.com

Exit mobile version