Despite the addition of Paradox Pokémon for almost every type in Pokémon Scarlet and Violet, the absence of one specific type should not be dwelled upon. Paradox Pokémon are a fascinating and welcome addition to the series, offering players a glimpse of how certain Pokémon would appear in the past or future. While they may be overshadowed by the next generation, their impact on the series will endure. However, the exclusion of one specific type raises questions, even though the answer may be simple.
It is disappointing that Paradox forms followed the recent trend of being exclusive to specific titles, but both Scarlet and Violet did a commendable job of introducing more Paradox Pokémon in the DLCs. Scarlet introduced past forms of the Legendary Beasts from Johto, while Violet featured future forms of the Swords of Justice from Unova. Notably, every Paradox form was a dual type, making the absence of one type even more peculiar.
Currently, the Normal type is the only type not utilized by any known Paradox Pokémon in the series. While this may not be a significant loss given the type’s limited strengths, it remains unusual for it to be the sole type unused. The prevailing theory is that the Normal type is not distinctive enough to justify its use on a Paradox Pokémon, especially considering that early generations featured rather ordinary creatures of this type.
Another theory suggests that the absence of the Normal type from Paradox forms is related to animal evolution. Since the Normal type is primarily associated with everyday animals, particularly mammals, it would make sense for prehistoric creatures or dinosaurs not to fall into this category. As these creatures evolved into the modern-day Pokémon, they likely replaced their Normal type. This explanation also applies to future forms, as the new cyborg forms are anything but normal.
While the absence of the Normal type from Paradox forms may have multiple explanations, it adds an intriguing layer to the Pokémon Scarlet and Violet games.
2024-02-13 18:41:03
Post from screenrant.com