The Significance of the Emergence of Student Consulting Clubs

The Significance of the Emergence of Student Consulting Clubs



What the rise of student consulting clubs means

THE EMAIL had a businesslike tone. From a “client recruitment director”, it was “reaching out” to offer The Economist services. In the next ⁣sentence, the word “leverage”⁤ was used as a verb,⁢ relating to a “perspective”. It concluded ⁣with a question: “Would you⁤ be able to hop on a ​15-minute call”? Yet it stood out from the guff that clutters journalists’ inboxes for one reason: it came not ‌from⁢ an established firm but from an undergraduate economics student at Yale University. The perspective to be “leveraged” was that of “Gen Z”, a marketing term for people now aged from roughly 11 to 26. The offer was ‍made on behalf of the Yale Undergraduate Consulting ‌Group, a student club with around 60 members.

Postgraduate students have long provided⁤ paid services to corporate clients. But over the past decade or so, undergraduate “consulting clubs” have proliferated. The idea is to band together and offer to do ​work for firms for a fraction of⁣ the cost of hiring regular consultants, and in ​the process ‍learn a lot about business. Like real consultants, they pitch for clients, cold-calling or emailing.⁢ Some student clubs have a charitable bent: ‍180DC, a network of clubs founded in 2007 that has spread to scores of⁤ universities around the world, targets “social-impact organisations”. Others are more mercantile: the sender of the Yale email says the group‍ he belongs ​to has also worked with several large companies, doing jobs like market research for fees. ‍

Students quickly adopt the jargon of the industry they are aping, appointing themselves “project managers”, gathering information‍ from “subject-matter experts” and, at the end, producing “deliverables” for‍ clients: typically in the form of slide presentations. Work is carried out under ⁢legally enforceable ⁢non-disclosure agreements. All this is done alongside normal studies.

2023-06-29 09:38:40
Link⁤ from www.economist.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version