The Impact of Ambiguous Fetal-Personhood Laws on Hospitals in America

The Impact of Ambiguous Fetal-Personhood Laws on Hospitals in America

How confusing fetal-personhood ⁣laws in​ America affect hospitals

Since the Supreme‍ Court dissolved the ⁤federal right to abortion in June 2022, those⁣ who believe ‌that life begins at conception have won big across America. In Georgia, where a six-week abortion ban swiftly snapped ‍into effect, respect for the unborn has led to some strange policies. A pregnant woman​ can​ now declare a fetus with a detectable heartbeat a dependant on her state tax form, drive ⁣alone in the carpool​ lane on the motorway and‍ demand child-support payments ⁤from the ⁣father of her unborn baby.

Another result has been confusion about when ⁣and how doctors should treat⁣ periviable babies. Periviability is the ⁤period of ⁣a pregnancy​ between 21 and 24 weeks. Babies born at that point have a 10-40% chance of living ‌if given intensive care‌ (many factors complicate the calculation—for ‌example, girls ⁢mature a ‌week ahead of ⁢boys). Those who make it tend​ to develop serious disabilities. The standard of care is for neonatologists ⁣to​ work with ⁣the parents of periviable babies to decide whether to resuscitate or let them die.

Tucked into Georgia’s Living ‍Infants Fairness and ⁣Equality (LIFE) Act is a provision about what happens in the very unlikely event that ‌a baby survives a legal ⁢abortion. In ‌Georgia the six-week ban ‍has ‌exceptions in cases where⁢ a‌ mother’s life is at risk, ⁣for​ rape and incest, or if the fetus is not ⁣expected to survive the⁤ pregnancy. “If the child ⁣is capable of sustained life”, the law reads, “medical aid then available shall​ be rendered”. Doctors who⁢ disobey can​ be prosecuted. The general counsel at a big Georgia​ hospital has declared‌ that the law could apply not just to aborted fetuses but to​ other pre-term⁤ babies⁣ too.

2023-11-23 10:08:13
Article from www.economist.com

Exit mobile version