The Future of Asylum Seekers’ Housing on Bibby Stockholm: What Comes Next?

The Future of Asylum Seekers’ Housing on Bibby Stockholm: What Comes Next?

The Home Office’s decision to use the Bibby Stockholm barge to accommodate‌ asylum seekers generated controversy long before the first person set foot onboard.

But issues with ⁣its use came ‍to a‌ head on Friday⁤ when‌ the ‌government confirmed the asylum seekers were being evacuated just days after moving in because of legionella, a potentially deadly bacteria, being found in its water system. While officials have provided‍ a plan to use⁣ an RAF base instead, many questions remain.

1) What checks were carried⁤ out before people ⁤boarded the⁣ barge?

Multiple ​concerns have⁤ been raised about the risk of fire ⁣and the difficulty in evacuating⁢ the barge in the⁤ event of an emergency. The Home Office‍ has‍ not ‍confirmed whether⁣ or not the water system ⁢was checked and flushed through with chlorine before asylum seekers were placed⁣ on the barge.

2) Was ‍a water hygiene and safety plan signed off beforehand?

An outbreak management plan drawn up by the sub-contractors, Landry & Kling, and shared⁣ with NHS Dorset, highlighted that there⁣ was no potable water⁣ storage ⁤on the vessel, but days⁤ before the legionella ​scandal broke Home Office sources said that‌ was ‍nothing to worry about.

3) The Home Office failed ⁤to be ⁤promptly alerted about the legionella. What happened?

Landry & Kling have not⁢ answered this question, instead signposting the Guardian‌ to the ⁤Home Office for answers. ⁣There have been a⁤ variety of reports ⁢about who knew what and when, but it ⁤remains unclear exactly how many people knew about⁢ the legionella test result on‌ Monday, when the council shared it with the contractors and whether or not any decision was taken to ​delay communicating ⁢this ​news.

It was certainly bad‌ timing‌ for the ‌start of the government’s “small⁢ boats week” – which it intended⁣ to use ⁣to show‍ progress on crossings – that legionella was discovered⁣ on board the barge it ⁢intends to‍ use to deter them.

4) What protocols are ⁢in‌ placebetween the Home Office‌ and the contractor?

The Home Office has said it⁤ will publish the contract in⁣ due course but has not yet published details, beyond the fact that it is part of a‌ £1.6bn​ contract ‍with the Australian ‌firm CTM, which the Independent ‌revealed was awarded in February without competition.

The overall‌ contract is for “bridging accommodation⁢ and travel services”.

5) Will the plumbing​ system be replaced before moving people⁢ back on to the barge?

Independent legionella ⁤experts have ⁣said that it is very difficult to​ eliminate once it has taken hold and that ⁢the ageing plumbing system on Bibby Stockholm may have dead legs, which ‌means ‌that even after the system has ⁢been​ flushed legionella could continue to be present.

The barge dates back to the 1970s ⁤and the Home ⁤Office declined to say what repairs​ were⁣ carried out before being towed to Portland. It said the ⁤barge had been subject ⁢to a Lloyd’s Register quality assurance inspection and certification and regulatory inspection⁤ by the UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency.

The Home Office had not commented on…

2023-08-14 14:01:23
Link from www.theguardian.com

Exit mobile version