The Consequences of Inefficiently Organized Meetings

The Consequences of Inefficiently Organized Meetings



The curse of the badly run meeting

In January ⁣1944 the‍ Office of Strategic Services, an American wartime​ intelligence agency, ​issued​ a short document. The “Simple Sabotage Field⁢ Manual” offered ‌advice on how ordinary citizens in occupied Europe could disrupt the German war machine.

To cause physical damage, the guide tells the “citizen-saboteur” to use everyday items like salt, nails, pebbles and candles as weapons.​ This bit ⁣of the guide ⁣is a window into historical⁤ derring-do: dried-up sponges that can‍ expand to plug sewer systems, jammed locks ‍on unguarded buildings, various⁤ references to​ emery dust.

But the guide also outlines a less direct sort ‍of sabotage, which is alarmingly familiar to ⁤anyone who works in an office today. ⁣This form of obstruction involves behaviour that confuses, demoralises and delays. Manager-saboteurs should ensure that three people have to approve⁣ things when one would do. Employees should spread disturbing rumours. Everyone should “give lengthy and incomprehensible explanations when questioned”. At some point a⁢ wartime‌ effort to hurt the Nazis appears to have been mistaken ‍for​ a serious ‌guide on how to run the modern workplace.

2023-11-13 10:58:24
Source from www.economist.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version