Old Guard in Thailand Maintains Control Despite Voters’ Desire for Change

Old Guard in Thailand Maintains Control Despite Voters’ Desire for Change


The election was supposed to be ⁤about change. Three months ago, Thai voters propelled ​the progressive​ Move Forward Party⁢ to a surprise victory. “A new day for the people ​has arrived,” said Pita Limjaroenrat,⁢ the party leader, as he paraded through the streets ⁣of Bangkok.

On Tuesday, ‌Thailand ⁤named a new prime minister, but it was not Mr. Pita. A coalition government was formed in ​Parliament, made up almost entirely of parties linked to the generals who led⁢ the last military coup.⁢ Move Forward is in the opposition.

Now, many Thais are asking‌ why the future they had ⁢voted for​ is⁣ looking so much like the past.

“If you ⁢go around and talk ‍to⁤ middle-class Thais at the moment, they’re saying: ‘What the‌ hell did we have this ⁤election for, if this is the result that we get?’” said Christopher Baker, a historian of Thailand.

Thailand, Mr. ⁤Baker said, is giving ‍up a‌ chance to “reverse the fact that it’s been​ going backward, in almost every sense, for the last 15 years.”

As⁢ the second-largest economy in Southeast Asia and an ally of the United States, Thailand was once a powerful player ⁢in⁤ the region. More recently it⁣ has suffered from a period of prolonged ​economic stagnation, brought about by⁢ nine years of military rule under Prime⁤ Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, the general who seized ‍power in a coup in⁣ 2014. Mr. Prayuth has steered Thailand away ‍from‍ democracy ⁢and toward authoritarian rule — he cracked down on pro-democracy protests and oversaw the rewriting ⁢of a Constitution that⁢ gave the military more ‌power.

His term ​fueled rising public anger and frustration, culminating in mass ​protests in 2020. For the first time, disaffected⁣ young‍ Thais questioned publicly ‍the relevance of the country’s powerful monarchy, a topic previously considered taboo. They asked why Thailand needed a royal defamation law, one of the world’s strictest,⁢ that ⁣carries a maximum sentence​ of up to ​15 years in prison.

Move Forward capitalized ⁢on this anti-royalist, anti-military sentiment, which became the‌ bedrock of the party’s progressive platform. It​ announced more than​ 300 policy proposals,⁤ including shrinking the military‍ budget and breaking‌ up big business. No political ‍party‍ had ever been so explicit ⁤about changing⁤ the status quo.

“No one would have thought that the party whose policy is to ⁣reform the monarchy and the military could win” the election, said Aim Sinpeng, a senior lecturer in politics at ​the University of⁤ Sydney, in Australia. “I don’t ​think you can take that significance away, ever.⁢ It’s completely changed Thailand.”

Move Forward’s election victory jolted the political ‍elite, which quickly set the wheels​ in motion to block ‌the party’s ascent. In the days after the election, the complaints against Mr. Pita piled up. The Constitutional Court ⁤suspended him from Parliament, ‍pending a review of a case involving his ‌shares in a now-defunct media company. The military-appointed Senate blocked ⁣him from becoming the ⁢prime minister…

2023-08-24 02:40:58
Source from www.nytimes.com

Exit mobile version