India eyes home-grown OS to compete with Android, iOS

India eyes home-grown OS to compete with Android, iOS



India eyes home-grown OS to compete with Android, iOS
India’s Minister of State for Electronics and Information Technology desires non-public tech companies and tutorial establishments to work collectively on an Indian cell OS that might compete with Android and iOS.

Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

The Indian authorities is hoping to spur the nation’s non-public sector to create a nationwide cell working system that may compete with Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, the Minister of State for Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), mentioned this week his company plans to encourage the tech trade and tutorial establishments to collaborate on a home-grown Indian cell OS, in response to a report in The Economic Times of India.

“There is not any third one,” Chandrasekhar mentioned. “Therefore, in a whole lot of methods there’s large curiosity in MeitY and within the Government of India to even create a brand new handset working system. We are speaking to folks. We are taking a look at a coverage for that.”

Industry analysts had been instantly skeptical that an indigenous OS in India might compete with the likes of Apple’s or Android’s cell platforms.

Jack Gold, principal analyst at J. Gold Associates, mentioned that whereas its laudable India is attempting to create a competitor and launch extra tech industries inside the nation, “it’s very unlikely that it can produce a true competitor to Android especially and also iOS.”

This isn’t India’s first try and create its personal working system nor would the nation be the primary to try it now, Gold famous. For instance, China’s Alibaba Group developed a local-services arm and debuted the “Alibaba Local Services Operating System.”

“Since [China has] an enormous inhabitants base, very similar to India does, they thought it may very well be an actual recreation changer for the native market,” mentioned Gold. “But the reality is, most customers of smartphones are drawn to particular apps they use recurrently (e.g., Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, and so forth.), and if these apps aren’t accessible on the OS powering a selected machine, then customers gained’t purchase it.

“That’s not to say that a localized OS for lower-end devices can’t grab some market share,” he said, “but as a general rule, it’s highly unlikely that you can change the dynamics of users wanting to interact with specific apps —  and if they aren’t available on your device, then they won’t want it.”

Additionally, there’s no incentive for main app distributors to port their apps to a regionally created OS, Gold mentioned, noting there simply isn’t sufficient quantity to take action.

“So, it’s a chicken and egg situation – apps don’t get ported due to low volume of devices, and people don’t buy the devices due to lack of popular apps. This is what caused the downfall of BlackBerry, Symbian, WebOS, etc.,” Gold mentioned.

In 2010, India’s authorities labored to create a brand new laptop working system with a watch to enhancing the safety of its laptop programs.

As for the newest push, Chandrasekhar mentioned growing an Indian OS wouldn’t solely “create an alternative choice to iOS and Android,” however just like the latter OSes, the platform might drive a local handset {hardware} market.

In October, Chandrasekhar introduced plans for India to turn into an digital manufacturing hub and provide chain to the world. “We see India being very a significant provider of trusted goods and service to the global market,” he mentioned on the time whereas talking on the Public Affairs Forum of India. “There is an opportunity and we are acting on it.”

By 2024 or 2025, Chandrasekhar mentioned he desires to see India’s digital manufacturing value roughly $250 billion to $300 billion.

While a top-end, native smartphone isn’t more likely to acquire momentum in India, particularly if the federal government backs it to particular backed telephones and types, what might acquire some traction are telephones within the low-end market, in response to Nabila Popal, analysis director for IDC’s World Wide Tracker Group for Consumer Devices.

“But I highly doubt it will make a huge global impact, or even challenge Apple within India, as the Apple brand name carries a huge premium/luxury image and is aspirational for the common folk, as due to the high price point, it is something only with the rich/elite class of the population,” Popal mentioned.

India’s cell phone market lags behind that of different developed nations, in response to IDC. For instance, about 30% of the market remains to be represented by press-button kind function telephones. The prime three manufacturers in India are Xiaomi, Samsung, and Vivo with 23%, 17%, and 16% share, respectively, in response to IDC’s Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker. (Apple’s share of the smartphone market in India hovers round 3%.)

In the US, Canada, and the UK, function telephones make up lower than 5% of all cell units.

In phrases of value segments, as much as 80% Smartphones price lower than $200, and nearly 95% are beneath $400 in any given quarter, in response to IDC.

“In general, globally, it’s been hard for other OSes to succeed in the presence of iOS and Android. We have seen it with Blackberry, Windows, and now Harmony OS,” Popal mentioned, “regardless of the huge branding and investments put into it.”

There is one risk for the success of an Indian OS: the likelihood it might run in compatibility mode to allow Android apps or iOS apps to work on it, Gold mentioned. It’s extremely unlikely Apple would ever permit that.

Even trying to port apps from a usually open-source Android could be a stretch, Gold mentioned. “Here too, those apps that are owned by Google are very popular (e.g., Google Assistant, Maps, Waze, Google Workspace, etc.).

“So bottom line, I don’t see how a local Indian OS can have any real impact on the market share of either Android of iOS,” he said. “In my opinion, India would have more success in trying to build a locally designed smartphone that uses Android, much like China did. But India at this point doesn’t have the infrastructure that China has to manufacture and distribute to the rest of the world, so even this is a long shot for them.”


Exit mobile version