The Australian War Memorial has acknowledged the “gravity of the decision” in the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case and says it is considering changes to the displays involving Australia’s most <a href="https://news.ad-astra.icu/latest-news-kerry-stokes-disagrees-with-defamation-case-verdict-against-ben-roberts-smith.html” title=”Latest news: Kerry Stokes disagrees with defamation case verdict against Ben Roberts-Smith”>decorated living soldier.
The statement follows calls to remove Roberts-Smith’s uniform from public display at the memorial in Canberra.
The Australian War Memorial chair, Kim Beazley, said on Friday that the federal court ruling involved “a civil legal case” and was “one step in a longer process”.
“Collection items relating to Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG, including his uniform, equipment, medals and associated art works, are on display in the memorial’s galleries,” he said in a statement on behalf of the Australian War Memorial council.
“We are considering carefully the additional content and context to be included in these displays.
“The memorial acknowledges Afghanistan veterans and their families who may be affected at this time.”
Beazley, a former Labor leader and defence minister, said the memorial “assists in remembering, interpreting and understanding Australia’s experience of war and its enduring impact”.
He said that included “the causes, conduct and consequences of war”.
In a landmark defamation case ruling on Thursday, Justice Anthony Besanko found that, on the balance of probabilities, Roberts-Smith kicked a handcuffed prisoner off a cliff in Darwan in 2012 before ordering a subordinate Australian soldier to shoot the injured man dead.
Besanko also found that in 2009 Roberts-Smith ordered the execution of an elderly man found hiding in a tunnel in a bombed-out compound codenamed “Whiskey 108”, as well as murdering a disabled man with a prosthetic leg during the same mission, using a light machine gun.
Roberts-Smith has always denied wrongdoing. He has not yet announced whether he plans to appeal against the ruling, but he has resigned from Seven West Media.
On Friday the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, recommitted his government to acting on the Brereton inquiry into alleged war crimes by Australian special forces soldiers.
In his first public remarks after the defamation ruling, Albanese told reporters in Singapore that the judgment was “a determination of a civil proceeding between two parties”.
“It would be inappropriate to comment on the detail of that given the potential that is then there for future action that the government might be a party to,” Albanese said.
Albanese said the government would implement the Brereton inquiry recommendations “to the extent possible”. He described that commitment as “very important”.
“That is an area in which we have a responsibility and we have indicated very clearly that we would take up that responsibility,” the prime minister said.
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
Albanese also argued Australia’s international standing was…
2023-06-02 02:03:09
Original from www.theguardian.com