EU AI Act receives criticism from digital advocacy group

EU AI Act receives criticism from digital advocacy group

Digital Europe, an advocacy group that represents digital industries across‌ the continent, has ‌released a ​joint statement ahead of​ the EU’s AI Act’s final⁣ weeks of negotiations, ⁢warning that over-regulation could stymie innovation​ and cause startups to leave‍ the ‍region.

The⁣ group’s core argument is that the⁢ AI Act now goes beyond its original intended‌ scope, and should ⁣instead remain focused on high-risk use cases, rather ‌than being directed at specific technologies. Digital Europe also warned that the financial burden⁤ the Act could place on companies wanting to‍ bring AI-enabled products to market could make operating out ​of the EU‍ unstainable ​for smaller organizations.

“For ‍Europe​ to ​become a global digital powerhouse, we need companies that can lead on AI innovation also using foundation models and‍ GPAI (general-purpose AI),” the statement read.⁣ “As ‍European digital industry representatives, we see a huge opportunity in foundation models, and new ⁣innovative players emerging ‍in⁤ this space, many of them born here in Europe. Let’s not regulate them out of​ existence ​before they get a chance to scale, or force them to leave.”

The letter was signed by⁢ 32 members of Digital Europe and ​outlined four recommendations that ‍signatories believe would allow the Act ‌to strike the necessary ​balance between regulation and innovation. These ⁣include ensuring a risk-based approach remains at the core of ‍the AI Act;​ better aligning ⁤the Act with⁣ existing product safety legislation; and ‌ignoring calls for ⁣the regulation⁣ to tackle copyright issues.

“The EU’s comprehensive copyright protection and enforcement framework already contains provisions⁣ that can help address AI-related copyright issues, ‌such as the ​text and‍ data mining exemption and corresponding,” the statement read.

Concerns of over-regulation have been previously raised

This is not the first time the EU’s AI Act has faced criticism from ‌industry leaders expressing concern about‍ the legislation’s scope ⁤and potential‍ to over-regulate​ the ⁤industry.

In June, 163 prominent executives representing some of Europe’s biggest⁣ technology and ​business companies, including Airbus, ARM, Capgemini, Schneider Electric, and Siemens, signed an open letter urging the EU to​ adopt a more hands-off‌ approach to AI regulation,⁢ worrying that the⁤ draft ⁢AI Act would make‍ the⁣ continent​ less competitive in the fast-growing field.

“Wanting to anchor the regulation of generative ⁢AI in law and proceeding with a rigid compliance‍ logic is as bureaucratic of an⁣ approach as it‌ is ineffective ‍in fulfilling its purpose,” the letter said. “In a context where we know very ​little about the real ​risks, the business model, or the applications of generative AI, European law should confine itself to stating broad​ principles in a risk-based approach.”

Although the AI Act was approved by the‌ European Parliament in June, it needs⁤ to be ratified by each EU⁣ country before it becomes…

2023-11-29 02:41:03
Source from www.computerworld.com rnrn

Exit mobile version