Developer Explains Why Some Bad Steam Reviews Might Be Coming From Scammers

Developer Explains Why Some Bad Steam Reviews Might Be Coming From Scammers

Image: Cowcat Games

Steam is each an easy-to-use digital sport storefront and a rabbit gap of shady shit, stuffed with bizarre, archaic leftovers from previous concepts Valve by no means obtained round to ending or bettering. One such instance is the curator system. Most customers barely work together with it, however lately an indie developer believes the system is being utilized by scammers who additionally promote sport codes on grey markets. They declare that as a result of they didn’t present free codes their newest sport was focused by these supposed grifters on Steam.

Watch

CCOffEnglishThe Week In Games: Remake Mania02:24Now enjoying

Elden Ring’s One Piece Mod Makes The Game TerrifyingFriday 1:03PM07:11Now enjoying

Outer Wilds: Echoes of the Eye (The Lost Reels) – Last Dream of HomeThursday 11:03AM

Yesterday on Twitter, Cowcat, the developer behind Brok—a newly launched point-and-click beat ‘em up starring an alligator—shared a now-viral thread explaining how a particular type of scam involving curators, Steam codes, and reviews works. Steam curator lists are user-made and anyone can create and update them with reviews for new or old games, helping people easily find the next game to purchase. And while technically nothing in the thread is confirmed by the supposed scammers themselves, the evidence is telling and is another example of the types of shit smaller game devs have to deal with when trying to make and sell games in the year 2022. Though, scammers tricking devs and PR into giving up codes isn’t a brand new phenomenon by any means.

Advertisement

On August 28, simply two days after Brok’s launch date, Cowcat defined that the sport was being focused by some Steam curators with suspicious damaging critiques. While many of those curators had a whole bunch of constructive critiques for varied different video games, some had launched damaging curator critiques for Brok.

What makes this extra suspicious is that many of those curators solely had one damaging overview and it was their Brok overview. Cowcat claims that many of those curators had initially posted constructive critiques for Brok. But then one thing modified. So, what occurred? Well, the dev believes that this try to filter out scammers by emailing them free codes had angered some individuals.

G/O Media might get a commissionUp to 90% offHumble Bundle’s Summer Sale

Game and Save
Great information for PC avid gamers on the market trying to economize and add extra video games to your backlog which you’ll finally get to. Humble Bundle has kicked off its Summer Sale during which it can save you as much as 90% on video games.

Shop at Humble BundleAdvertisement

Normally, indie dev e mail inboxes are flooded with individuals requesting codes, claiming to be reviewers, critics, YouTubers, publishers, and so forth. As Cowcat mentions within the thread, most of those are scammers trying to get some free codes that may then be offered on shady key-selling websites. But in an effort to not by chance ignore the few legit critics and reviewers reaching out to play Brok, Cowcat got here up with a plan. They despatched all these individuals Steam keys for the free-to-play Brok prologue, which acts as a prequel and demo to the complete sport. Cowcat figured individuals who actually wished to play the sport for overview functions would use the code, see it was for the free prologue and attain out concerning the mistake. And whereas some did certainly contact the dev concerning the “mistake” most didn’t, which Cowcat believes is as a result of they didn’t wish to play it, they as a substitute shortly offered the important thing through shady key sellers.

Cowcat

This transfer doubtless prompted these scammers some bother as individuals who purchased the keys found that they had been screwed. So Cowcat believes that a few of these con artists turned to their curator pages on Steam and reviewed Brok negatively earlier than its launch. What makes these critiques very suspect is that Cowcat by no means gave out the complete sport to those individuals, but their critiques declare to have performed the complete sport.

Advertisement

It must be famous that any curator can overview any sport on Steam, even when they don’t personal it or have by no means performed it, making it even simpler for individuals to make use of the outdated, barely up to date system for fraud.

Kotaku has reached out to Cowcat and Valve.

After all this, Cowcat says they plan on reporting these Steam curators to Valve. They additionally additional criticized the corporate for persevering with to permit shady Steam curators and rip-off artists to make use of constructive and damaging critiques like this to “blackmail” indie devs. Further, they requested individuals to not purchase video games through shady key websites because the devs don’t see a dime from these gross sales because the codes are sometimes gained through scams just like the one Cowcat believes these curators are concerned in.

Advertisement

As for the way this can have an effect on Brok, Cowcat isn’t fearful as they don’t imagine these curators result in many gross sales on Steam. But they’re nonetheless glad their thread went viral and helps unfold the phrase on how these kinds of scams proceed to go unpunished on Steam.

  

 

Exit mobile version