Chevron Strike Demonstrates a Revitalized Union Movement

Chevron Strike Demonstrates a Revitalized Union Movement



A strike at Chevron⁤ shows a reinvigorated ⁢union movement

OVER THE past four decades ⁤American bosses have grown unused to labour unrest. Ever since Ronald ​Reagan sacked thousands of striking air-traffic controllers⁤ in 1981,‍ shortly after ⁣being elected president (and despite once leading the Hollywood actors’ union), American trade ‍unions have been relatively meek. America experienced an average of 17 big work stoppages⁣ (affecting ‌1,000 workers or more) a year ⁤from 2000 to 2022, ⁣down from ⁣84 annually between 1977 and 1999.​ Union membership has fallen from a peak of 20m members in 1979 to just over 14m last year, split⁢ evenly​ between the ​public and private sectors. Just 6% of⁣ private-sector​ workers belong to a union ⁢these ​days, compared with more than 20%‍ in the 1970s.

This year a⁤ confluence of tight job markets,‍ accelerating technological ​change (think ChatGPT) and rising public support‌ for unions ⁣(which⁣ enjoy a‍ record 67% approval‌ rate ⁣among Americans, according ​to Gallup, a pollster) has emboldened workers. Strikes are proliferating. There have been 16 big ones in the country in⁢ the first seven months of this year, up from 11 in the same period in 2022 and​ the most since 2005. Hollywood writers⁤ and actors are in a months-long standoff with studios. On August 30th 99.5% of unionised American Airlines flight⁤ attendants voted to go ​on ⁢strike. Workers at Detroit’s big carmakers are threatening to follow suit.

If that weren’t irksome enough‌ for American ⁢bosses, some of their businesses are feeling ⁣the pain abroad, too.‌ On September​ 8th workers at two Chevron plants producing liquefied ⁤natural gas (LNG)⁤ in Australia may halt work. They will down tools for up to 11 hours a ‌day, ​escalating to a full-blown ⁢strike if no agreement on pay is reached. Offshore Alliance, the​ union representing Chevron’s Aussie workers, recently rejected the ⁤energy ⁢supermajor’s pay proposals, claiming​ that they were​ stingier than⁣ those offered by its second-rate competitors.

2023-09-07⁣ 09:20:20
Link from www.economist.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version