Canada Receives Intelligence from U.S. Regarding Assassination of Sikh Leader

Canada Receives Intelligence from U.S. Regarding Assassination of Sikh Leader


American spy agencies‍ provided information to Ottawa after the killing of a Sikh separatist leader but Canada developed ‍the most⁢ definitive intelligence that ​led it to accuse India of ​orchestrating the plot, according to Western allied officials.

In⁣ the aftermath of the killing, U.S. intelligence agencies offered their Canadian⁢ counterparts⁣ context that​ helped‍ Canada conclude ‍that India ⁢had been involved. Yet what appears to be the “smoking gun,” intercepted communications of Indian diplomats in Canada ​indicating involvement in the‍ plot, was gathered by Canadian officials, allied officials said.

While Secretary of State Antony ⁤J. Blinken has called on ‍India to cooperate with the⁢ Canadian investigation, American officials have largely ​tried to avoid triggering ​any diplomatic⁤ blowback from India. But the disclosure of ‍the involvement of​ U.S. intelligence risks ensnaring Washington⁤ in ⁤the diplomatic battle between Canada ‌and⁤ India at a time when it⁣ is keen​ to develop New Delhi as a closer partner.

The United States did not learn about the⁢ plot, or evidence pointing⁤ to India’s involvement in it, until after operatives had ⁤killed the Sikh leader, Hardeep ‍Singh Nijjar, allied⁤ officials said.

Two men fatally shot Mr. Nijjar, ⁤a Canadian⁤ citizen who had advocated independence‍ for ⁢a Sikh-majority⁢ region of India, in the Vancouver ​area on June⁢ 18.

Before the killing, Canadian ​officials had told Mr. Nijjar that he was in danger. Several friends and ‍associates of Mr. Nijjar said that‍ he‍ had been warned repeatedly about threats against him and ⁤had been cautioned ⁤to avoid the temple.

After his death, American officials ‍told their Canadian counterparts that Washington had not had any advance information about⁣ the plot, and that if U.S. ⁣officials had they ‍would have immediately informed Ottawa under the intelligence agencies’ “duty to warn” doctrine, according⁤ to two allied officials.

The ​officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss what has become a‍ diplomatic ⁣firestorm, said Canadian officials had offered a general ⁤warning to ‌Mr. ‌Nijjar, but had not told him that he was the​ target ‌of an Indian government plot.

The United States routinely, and automatically, shares huge amounts ⁢of intercepted communications with its closest⁣ intelligence partners, including Canada. But the contextual information about the killing was⁣ shared deliberately⁤ as part of a package of various intelligence streams.

A spokesman for the White House declined to comment. U.S. officials were ⁢reluctant to discuss the killing because⁢ although‍ Washington‌ wants ⁣to assist ⁢Canada, a⁤ close ⁣ally, it does not want to alienate India, a partner with which it ​is hoping to expand ties as a counterbalance ⁣to China’s rising influence in Asia.

The accusation has​ created a diplomatic rift between Ottawa and New Delhi, leading each to ​expel the other’s intelligence officers and India ‌to suspend visas ‌for Canadians.

Nevertheless, the killing, and the⁣ alleged involvement of the Indian…

2023-09-23 15:16:06
Link from ⁤ www.nytimes.com

Exit mobile version