Can a Deeply Divided Australia Empower the Aboriginal Voice?

Can a Deeply Divided Australia Empower the Aboriginal Voice?


It was billed as a modest proposal that would help heal the ‍traumas of history and⁣ unite the country. Australia would change its Constitution⁢ to recognize the original inhabitants of the‍ land and ⁢enshrine an advisory body in Parliament‍ for ⁤Aboriginal people, giving them a⁣ greater say on ‌issues that affect their lives.

But over the past year,‍ the proposal has exposed racial⁢ fault lines and become ensnared ‍in a ⁣bitter culture war,‍ in a country that‍ has ⁢long struggled to reckon with its colonial legacy.

One former prime minister said it would “entrench ‌victimhood,” and another called British colonization the “luckiest thing that happened ⁢to this country.” ‍One opponent said ‍Aboriginal people wanting “a voice” should “learn English” and suggested that those ‍who receive welfare payments should prove their heritage with blood tests.

And now, public polling ⁢suggests, a referendum on⁤ the matter ⁣— ⁢which will be held on Oct. 14 — is likely to fail. That result,⁣ according to Thomas Mayo, an Indigenous ​leader, would mean “Australia officially dismissing our very ⁤existence.”

The vote is an inflection point‍ for Australia’s relationship with the​ hundreds⁣ of Indigenous tribes that first occupied the ‌continent ‍and today are a small minority⁣ in the country. Since colonization, they have been subject to ‍ineffective or deliberately‍ harmful government policy, activists said. Prior ⁢to a 1967 constitutional referendum, Indigenous people were not counted as part of Australia’s population. They‌ remain stuck at the⁣ bottom of society, with an average life expectancy eight years lower than the national average ⁢and‌ the highest rate of incarceration in the world.

The Voice‌ to Parliament⁢ is the cumulation of a fight by Indigenous activists to ‌be ‌recognized in the 120-year-old Constitution‌ and‍ for equality. It was developed⁤ by over 250 Indigenous leaders who gathered at Uluru, a sacred site once known as Ayers Rock, in 2017. They sought to address what they called ⁣“the torment of our powerlessness.”

The plan for a ​referendum was laid out⁣ about ⁢a year ago ⁣by Prime‌ Minister Anthony‍ Albanese, the leader of the center-left Labor Party, who‌ announced the referendum date ⁤on Wednesday.

The body would give advice​ to Parliament, government ministers and the departments they oversee on issues affecting Indigenous people. If​ the vote succeeds, the⁢ body’s⁣ design and precise details will be determined by Parliament, but its architects say members ⁢will be chosen by Indigenous communities, who represent less than​ 4 percent of Australia’s population. The government has said its priorities are​ health, education, jobs⁢ and housing.

“There’s a broad‌ sense that things can and absolutely should be better for Aboriginal and Torres ⁣Strait​ Islander peoples in this country,” said Dean Parkin, the director of‍ Yes23, the group‌ leading the campaign in‍ support of the Voice.

But proponents must‍ convince the⁤ public that changing the Constitution will have‌ a practical…

2023-08-29 20:48:42
Link from www.nytimes.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version