All-Male Supreme Court in South Carolina Upholds Six-Week Abortion Ban

All-Male Supreme Court in South Carolina Upholds Six-Week Abortion Ban

South Carolina’s ⁣new all-male highest court on Wednesday reversed course on⁢ abortion rights, upholding ‍the state’s strict⁤ six-week ban⁢ on the procedure.

The panel overrode an earlier decision in which ⁤the court decided a similar⁢ restriction was unconstitutional.

The court on Wednesday found that the state constitution’s protection against “unreasonable invasions of privacy” did not include a right⁣ to abortion, and that the state law was “within the zone of reasonable policy decisions rationally related⁣ to the⁢ state’s interest in protecting the unborn”.

Agonising delays for women as Dobbs decision worsens OB-GYN shortageRead ⁣more

A judge in May had put a temporary halt to South Carolina’s ​new law banning most abortions around six weeks of pregnancy until the state supreme court could review the measure.

The ruling at the time, by Judge⁤ Clifton Newman, came just about 24 hours after the state governor, Henry McMaster, signed the bill, and meant South Carolina reverted⁤ back​ to a ban ⁢at about 20 weeks after fertilization.

The new ruling is a ‍blow to reproductive⁣ rights campaigners. On Wednesday, McMaster hailed the decision, issuing a⁢ statement saying: “The supreme​ court’s ruling marks a historic moment in our state’s history and ‍is the culmination of years of hard work and determination⁢ by so many in our⁢ state to ensure that the sanctity of⁣ life is protected.”

It went on: ‍“With this victory, we protect the​ lives‌ of⁢ countless unborn children and reaffirm South Carolina’s place as⁤ one of the most pro-life ⁢states in America.”

The ⁢decision was ‌4-1, with the chief⁢ justice, Donald Beatty,⁣ in the minority.

“This decision is devastating not only because of the‌ impact ⁢it will‍ have ⁤on South Carolinians, but also because South Carolina is a critical state for access across the entire south-east region,” said Caroline Sacerdote, a staff attorney ​at the‍ Center ⁢for Reproductive Rights who helped bring the lawsuit⁣ against the new six-week ban.

“This morning, our clients had patients ‍coming in from Texas, Lousisana, ⁢Mississippi, patients who had traveled overnight to access critical, essential health care.”

Because of Wednesday’s ruling, Sacerdote ⁤said providers⁢ had to turn away those patients to adhere ‍to the six-week ban.

Greenville Women’s Clinic, one of just three abortion providers in South Carolina, ​had a ‍full waiting⁢ room of patients seeking ⁤the procedure this morning, according⁤ to Sacerdote.

It is unclear how abortion rights supporters will battle the latest six-week ban in South Carolina.

During last year’s special legislative session on the original six-week ban, South Carolina Republican lawmakers continually refused to create a ballot measure that would ask voters if they support the right‍ to abortion. Unlike states​ like Ohio and Michigan, South Carolina does not give the citizens the power to create their own ballot measures. Only the legislature can create a ⁢ballot measure on abortion.

Vicki Ringer, the director of…

2023-08-23⁣ 12:41:45
Link from www.theguardian.com

Exit mobile version