The antitrust lawsuit against Google is not a repeat of the DOJ-Microsoft battle

The antitrust lawsuit against Google is not a repeat of the DOJ-Microsoft battle

For longtime tech industry watchers, the US Department of Justice’s antitrust ⁢suit against Google feels like déjà vu all​ over again. Many⁣ of the charges in the suit have ⁢almost eerie echoes ⁣to those levied against Microsoft ‌in 1998.

Both‍ claim‌ the targets used their monopoly ​power illegally⁢ — in Google’s case, to maintain its market dominance ⁢in search; in Microsoft’s‍ case, ⁢to use Windows to squash competitors. In both cases, ⁤the very core of both companies was being attacked.

Despite those similarities, the current lawsuit against Google won’t be nearly as ‌consequential as was the fight against Microsoft. While it⁤ certainly means a great deal ⁣for‍ Google’s future, it likely won’t change the world and tech business the ⁤way the​ one against Microsoft did.

Here’s why.

Google’s stranglehold on search

Because of where Google and Microsoft stood in the tech world at the time each was⁤ sued, and because of the nature of the charges, the effect of⁣ current action against Google will be different. Today, it is just one ⁣tech giant among ⁤many — ⁤Meta, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, X⁣ (the company once known as ​Twitter), and many others.

The DOJ‌ contends that Google has illegally used its power⁢ to maintain a monopoly in internet search, and ⁣to kill off any potential competitors before they can even get a start. Its case against Google is relatively straightforward. It claims Google ⁣has a monopoly on the search ⁤market — more ​than a 90% market ‌share — and that it maintains that monopoly by paying smartphone manufacturers and wireless carriers, including Apple, Samsung, Verizon‍ and others, a combined $10 billion a year to make Google​ their default search engine.

The government contends those payments are a “powerful strategic weapon” to kill off and scare away rivals and make sure Google continues to keep its‍ internet search monopoly.‍ In opening arguments,​ the Justice⁤ Department’s⁣ lead courtroom lawyer, Kenneth Dintzer, said, “This feedback loop, this wheel, has been turning for more than 12 years. And it always turns to Google’s advantage.”

If the government ⁤wins, Google will ‌likely ⁢no longer be allowed to make those payments.​ The effects of doing that, though, are unclear. Will people abandon Google in droves for other ⁢search ⁢engines? Keep in mind that‌ the ‌default search engine ​for PCs is Microsoft’s ⁣Bing, and‍ yet Google dominates desktop and laptop search — it has ‍more than 83% market share. (Note: the default search for‌ Macs is ⁤Google, but Windows has a 70% worldwide operating system market share for desktops and ⁢laptops.) It⁤ may be that many people simply believe Google’s search is better⁢ than‌ that of‍ its competitors.

And even if users do choose alternate search engines such as Bing, DuckDuckGo, or others, will that really⁣ change the way they use their computers or⁢ the internet? Unlikely. They’ll ⁢just use a different ⁢search engine to find what they’re looking for.

Will it allow a new…

2023-10-02 06:00:07
Original from www.computerworld.com rnrn

Exit mobile version