Sunak grants Labour access to civil servants for potential election triumph preparations

Sunak grants Labour access to civil servants for potential election triumph preparations

Rishi Sunak has given ‍permission for⁢ Labour shadow ministers to start talks with civil servants about how they ⁣would run a government​ if they win the election later this year – a⁤ routine but nonetheless highly symbolic process ahead of a possible handover ⁢of power.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “In line with the longstanding process set out in the cabinet manual, the prime minister has authorised access ​talks⁤ between the official opposition and civil service.”

The cabinet secretary, Simon Case,‍ would “oversee and arrange these discussions”, the‍ statement added.

A Labour source confirmed that the​ party had received the letter confirming the permission for what are formally known as access talks on Thursday evening, and would reply⁤ “in due course”.

While such discussions are a ​necessary step so that an opposition party can step immediately into government if they⁤ win an election, they nonetheless mark a significant change, as opposition MPs ​do not usually ‌have such discussions with civil servants.

The ⁣talks⁤ thus have to be formally authorised‌ by the prime minister. For a period in the 2000s, ‌the PM would do this in advance at the start of parliament, meaning they could ‌begin whenever needed.

But under David Cameron this practice ended, and under Sunak,⁢ Downing Street has faced repeated questions in recent weeks about when he would grant​ permission, before an election which could ⁣happen as early as ‌tspring, although autumn is now seen as more likely.

An Institute for⁢ Government (IfG) study of the practice⁢ showed that in elections since 1992, access talks began anywhere from 16 months before the election to a matter of weeks. In​ 2017, they were authorised on⁤ the day Theresa May called the election, leaving just ⁤51 days for Labour to speak to officials.

There is, similarly, no formal guidance on how often the meeting should take place. The IfG briefing cites the experience of Ed Balls, who said that in 1997, as a special adviser to the shadow chancellor, ‍Gordon Brown, he met⁤ the chief civil servant in the Treasury “maybe once or twice a week, for two or three hours⁣ at a time” in the run-up to the‌ election.

2024-01-11​ 15:29:03
Article⁤ from www.theguardian.com

Exit mobile version