State Media Urges China to Emphasize ‘Houses for Living, Not Speculation’

State Media Urges China to Emphasize ‘Houses for Living, Not Speculation’

BEIJING,⁣ Aug 23 (Reuters)​ – China should adhere to the ‌principle that “houses are for living in, not for speculation” ​for the time being, the state-run Economic⁢ Daily said in an​ editorial on Wednesday, amid an economically⁣ damaging downturn in the property sector.

China’s top leaders started using the phrase in late 2016, when they began introducing tighter rules ​for the property market‌ and its removal from the Politburo​ statement‌ in July was seen​ as a signal that some⁣ of those curbs could be unwound.

“The positioning of ‘houses are for living in,‍ not for speculation’ should be insisted on and it is‌ not ⁣out of date,” the ​Economic‍ Daily said in an editorial.

“In some popular cities, housing demand still exceeds ⁢supply. Once speculation on​ house prices resumes,‌ China may go back ‍to ⁣the old path of the over-reliance on the‌ real estate sector, which will have adverse impacts on economic and social development.”

In July’s key policy meeting, top leaders⁤ said China will adjust and optimise property policies in a timely manner, in response​ to profound changes in the supply and demand relationship in the property market.

The‍ rising risk⁣ of default ⁣among some developers and faltering ​economic recovery has led investors to expect more ‌and bigger stimulus to revive the housing‍ market.

But they were disappointed when the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) held the five-year loan ​prime⁢ rate steady on‌ Monday. The five-year rate ‌influences the pricing of mortgages, ‍and⁣ some analysts said the central ‍bank may be trying to protect lenders’ margins.

Property-related loans accounts for 40% of banks’ lending, and property ownership accounts for 60% of Chinese ⁣household wealth, the Economic Daily said.

Goldman ⁣Sachs⁣ analysts estimate the housing sector’s contribution to GDP growth is a drag of ⁤1.5 percentage ​points this year and likely⁢ to remain ⁢at least slightly negative‍ for the foreseeable ⁢future, according to a ‌note on Wednesday.

Reporting by Ellen ‌Zhang and Ryan ⁢Woo; Editing ⁤by Simon Cameron-MooreOur Standards: The Thomson ⁤Reuters Trust Principles. ⁣Acquire Licensing Rights, ⁢opens new tab

Link from www.reuters.com

Exit mobile version