A FEW MONTHS in the past Kim Beom-su regarded just like the face of accountable capitalism in South Korea. In March the billionaire founding father of Kakao, which runs the nation’s most profitable messaging app and a slew of different digital providers, promised to provide away half his wealth for charitable causes, the second Korean tycoon to make that pledge. Now he’s making headlines for some much less salubrious causes. Antitrust officers have reportedly set their sights on his non-public holding firm for allegedly failing to report correctly on its shareholders and associates.
Listen to this story
Your browser doesn’t assist the <audio> component.
Enjoy extra audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.
The obvious transfer towards Kakao’s founder is the newest salvo in an ongoing battle. Like their counterparts in America and China, South Korea’s know-how giants have come below scrutiny. Officials fear that as companies corresponding to Naver, which started life as a search engine, and Kakao have expanded into something from ride-hailing to private finance, they’ve picked up the dangerous habits of the chaebol. These sprawling conglomerates have been instrumental in making South Korea wealthy and proceed to dominate its economic system. But they’re infamous for murky governance constructions, oligopolistic enterprise practices and shut ties with the political elite.
Over the previous few weeks politicians have ramped up the rhetoric. “Kakao has turned from a symbol of growth and innovation into a symbol of old greed,” Song Young-gil, a pacesetter of the ruling Minjoo occasion, instructed the National Assembly this month. “We will find a way to stop its rapid expansion and help it coexist with small-business owners,” he warned.
The similar day regulators dominated that some monetary providers supplied by Kakao and Naver violated consumer-protection legal guidelines as a result of the platforms weren’t registered as intermediaries. The two corporations will now be required to abide by brokerage laws. Spooked traders dumped Kakao and Naver shares, shaving a tenth, or $11bn, off their mixed stockmarket worth.
Korean trustbusters, for his or her half, are investigating allegations that Kakao’s taxi-hailing service favours its personal pricier cabs. They need e-commerce platforms to attract up correct contracts with third-party sellers, and specify what commissions they earn. In August Coupang, the nation’s largest e-commerce agency, was fined 3.3bn gained ($2.8m) for urgent suppliers to decrease costs. South Korea’s largely unregulated crypto-exchanges should register as authorized buying and selling platforms.
The techlash is just not restricted to home tech darlings. On September 14th regulators fined Google $177m for not permitting variations of its Android working system to be put in on domestically made smartphones. And final month South Korea grew to become the primary nation to oblige Apple and Google to simply accept various funds programs of their app shops.
App builders like Epic Games, which suffered a courtroom defeat towards Apple in America on September tenth, welcomed the transfer. The maker of “Fortnite” invoked the South Korean regulation to attempt to get its app reinstated on Apple’s app retailer, from which it had been booted for breaching guidelines that barred such in-app funds. Apple has refused.
Lim Jung-wook, a enterprise capitalist, applauds the federal government’s instincts to guard customers and small suppliers. But he reckons stricter guidelines will do little to curb the tech corporations’ energy in the long term. “These firms’ services are too convenient for them not to keep growing.”
Nonetheless, confronted with sinking inventory costs, the Korean companies have begun to reply. On September 14th Kakao introduced a brand new 300bn-won fund to assist small suppliers and promised to scrap new providers corresponding to flower supply that compete with mom-and-pop companies. Mr Kim promised that the corporate would “throw away” its previous progress mannequin and substitute it with one which fostered “social responsibility”.
Coupang has chosen a extra combative method. It insists that its platform has made it simpler for small companies to get their merchandise to customers. And it’s interesting towards the antitrust fantastic, claiming that the penalty serves to guard chaebol corresponding to LG, which introduced the criticism. ■
For extra professional evaluation of the largest tales in economics, enterprise and markets, signal as much as Money Talks, our weekly publication.
This article appeared within the Business part of the print version below the headline “The different techlash”