Smart Voting Reform Introduced in New Jersey Allowed to Lapse

Smart Voting Reform Introduced in New Jersey Allowed to Lapse



New Jersey introduced a smart voting reform—then let it lapse

The covid-19 pandemic changed a lot of things. ⁢For some states, this included voting. Four states (California, Nevada, New Jersey and Vermont) and the District of⁤ Columbia ⁢decided to automatically send ⁤every voter a mail-in ballot.⁤ Five other states (Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, ⁢Utah and Washington) already did this before the pandemic. After implementing this temporary change ⁤for the 2020 presidential ⁤election New Jersey had the highest voter turnout in the country after Washington, ‌DC. Then⁤ it did what any reasonable government would do when something goes well. It ⁢allowed the provision to expire.

Being ‍citizens⁣ of one of the ⁤richest⁤ and most educated states, New ‌Jerseyans should⁤ vote more than⁢ they do, says Jake Grumbach, a public-policy professor at⁣ the University of California, Berkeley. In the ⁢previous presidential election, in 2016, only 62% of eligible voters in the state ​cast a ballot (about the same as ⁢the​ national average). This changed in 2020. New Jersey topped the league with⁤ a‍ 78%‌ turnout ​(compared with 67% nationally).

The⁣ pandemic⁣ election also seemed to engage⁢ a notoriously nonchalant group: younger voters. According‌ to a study by‍ the National Vote At Home ⁤Institute ⁣(NVAHI), a non-profit outfit that advocates ⁢for expanded voting access, among all the states New Jersey also came top ‌for participation among eligible voters aged 18-34, with a ⁤turnout of 64%. ‍In the previous presidential election, less ⁢than‌ half ⁢of young eligible New Jerseyans cast a‌ ballot.

2023-12-07‌ 09:46:10
Link from‌ www.economist.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version