SEC Criticizes Coinbase’s Compliance Efforts as Judge Appears to Support CEX

SEC Criticizes Coinbase’s Compliance Efforts as Judge Appears to Support CEX

Reuters

KEY ​POINTS

The⁢ SEC ⁤filed a case ‌against Coinbase ⁤in⁤ June over securities ‌law ​violations

The judge ⁣seemingly ‌aligned with ‌Coinbase’s⁤ argument⁢ about‌ SEC’s approving its‌ IPO

Coinbase⁣ is‍ now⁣ the⁣ surveillance ⁤partner⁣ of TradFi‍ institutions ⁤applying ‌for⁢ spot​ Bitcoin ‍ETF with​ the​ SEC

District​ Judge Katherine​ Polk ‌Failla, the⁣ federal judge​ in ‍charge ​of ‍the⁤ case ⁤between⁣ the⁤ U.S.⁢ Security ⁢and​ Exchange Commission (SEC) ​and‌ Coinbase, has ‍seemingly aligned‍ with Coinbase’s argument ⁤on⁢ why⁣ the⁣ agency‍ did not⁤ warn‌ the cryptocurrency⁤ exchange‌ of‌ any gray‌ areas in ⁣the⁤ past, noting that⁤ the financial ‍regulator could⁤ have given the ⁤firm a⁤ heads up prior⁣ to⁤ approving ‍its‌ public⁢ listing.

This ​comes after the SEC ⁣argued that‍ its approval⁢ of Coinbase’s⁣ S1-form prior to ⁢it going‍ public is ⁢not a⁤ blanket⁤ “blessing” and ‌does not prove⁢ that ​the crypto exchange⁢ business ‌complies with regulations.

“Simply⁢ because ​the ‍SEC allows ⁣a​ company to⁤ go⁢ public‌ does ‌not ‍mean‍ that the SEC is‌ blessing ⁣the underlying ​business or the ⁤underlying ⁤business‍ structure‌ or ​saying that‌ the underlying‍ business ‍structure‌ is ‍not⁢ in violation of the⁤ law,”⁢ SEC ⁤counsel Peter Mancuso said,​ according​ to⁣ a ⁤July ‍13‌ court document⁤ from ​last ⁣week’s pre-motion⁤ hearing.

“There is ‌no ​evidence being put ⁢forth ​that the SEC ⁣looked⁣ at specific assets⁢ and‌ made specific ⁢determinations ‍and​ then​ gave ‍Coinbase ⁣comfort that this would​ not⁤ later ⁤be found​ to‍ be a ⁢security,” he ​added.

The SEC counsel’s⁤ statement⁢ underlined that ​the agency’s approval ​of ​the‍ S-1 application‌ (SEC’s registration required⁢ for‌ U.S. companies ⁣that ⁣want to‍ be⁤ listed on⁢ a ⁣national exchange) ⁢of⁣ Coinbase⁢ to​ conduct⁤ an ⁢initial public⁢ offering ​(IPO) ⁤does not ‌reflect the commission’s blanket ‌approval to⁣ the exchange’s ⁤whole⁤ business.

Judge ⁣Failla ⁣responded to⁣ this by‌ saying,‍ “Let’s just pause so I can ‌just sort‍ of get rid of​ the skepticism I ​currently ⁤have as⁤ I ‍hear‌ that answer.”

“I am⁣ not⁤ saying that the commission ​should​ be ​omniscient‌ at⁢ the time ​it’s evaluating a registration statement⁣ and ​that ⁤it ⁢should know ⁣all​ things. ​But ⁤I ‌would have thought ⁣the​ commission ​was⁤ doing diligence into what ‌Coinbase⁣ was⁤ doing,⁣ and ⁢somehow⁤ I thought ​that it ‍would‌ say, you know, you really ⁤shouldn’t⁢ do this,” the​ judge⁢ said, ⁤according to the ⁣court document.

“This is‌ violative of ⁤the ⁢securities‍ laws, ⁤or⁣ we ⁢are kind⁣ of in some ​interesting ‍unchartered territory here with respect⁣ to‍ whether‍ the ⁤assets on your ‍platform ⁤are securities, so be ⁣forewarned‍ that maybe someday ​there could be ‌a⁢ problem,” she continued.

“You ‍never could⁤ have said​ to‍ them, ⁢’Hey, you‍ guys ⁣need ‌to register ⁢as​ a ‌securities⁣ exchange.’‍ That⁢ was ‌within‌ the‌ power of the‍ SEC to do,​ was ⁣it not,” Judge‌ Failla then explained, highlighting⁤ that it ​made ⁤sense ⁢for ‌Coinbase‍ to assume⁣ that it was in the clear since​ it received no​ warning from⁢ the⁢ SEC⁤ before its⁤ IPO.

“It’s not‍ crazy in the Failla ‌parlance⁢ for ​Coinbase to think that what they ⁢were‍ doing was⁣ OK⁢ because⁤ it‌ was ⁣exactly what ‍you let ⁢them do when ‍they issued⁢ the ‍S-1,” ‍she said ​further.

The‍ SEC​ filed⁢ a case against ​Coinbase ⁢in June ‌over securities⁢ law‌ violations.

Coinbase ‌is now the ⁤surveillance partner⁤ of all the traditional ‌financial ⁢institutions⁣ applying for​ spot​ Bitcoin‍ ETF with the ⁤SEC.

2023-07-19⁤ 16:48:03
Article⁢ from​ www.ibtimes.com

Exit mobile version