Quiet Cutting of Employees: Experts Argue It’s Illogical and Expensive

Quiet Cutting of Employees: Experts Argue It’s Illogical and Expensive

Companies are increasingly using role reassignments as ⁢a strategy to sidestep expensive layoffs, according to some tech industry experts. But they see it ⁣as ⁢generally short-sighted and likely to do a company more harm ​than good.

As with last year’s⁤ ‘quiet quitting’ trend, quiet cutting appears to be a‍ concept originally coined in the media —⁣ in this case, by The New York Times. The practice involves reassigning workers⁢ to ⁤roles that don’t align with their career goals ⁤to achieve ⁢workforce ⁢reduction⁣ by voluntary attrition ⁢— allowing companies to avoid​ paying costly severance packages or unemployment benefits.

“Companies are ​increasingly⁢ using role‍ reassignments as a⁢ strategy to sidestep expensive layoffs,” said​ Annie Rosencrans, people and culture director at HiBob, a human resource‍ platform​ provider. ‍“By redistributing roles within the workforce, organizations can manage costs while retaining valuable talent, aligning with the current trend of seeking ‌alternatives​ to traditional layoffs.”

Recognizing the signs of having been quietly cut is crucial ‍for an employee to address the situation. It often involves withholding career ⁤advancement ‍opportunities, denying⁣ compensation adjustments, ‍assigning unpleasant⁤ tasks, ‍creating ⁤unnecessary hurdles, and even ⁤isolating employees, according to Rosencrans.

“It can manifest as slowed ⁢growth, broken promises, a lack of feedback, ​and an encouragement for co-workers to distance‍ themselves from the affected employee,” Rosencrans said.

⁣Shutterstock/BazaWhat’s behind⁢ quiet cutting?

Zachary Chertok,⁤ research manager for IDC’s Employee Experience practice, said a variety of issues have combined to prompt quiet cutting among organizations.‍ For​ one, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies went on ⁤a hiring ⁢spree as⁤ remote work put digitization projects​ on steroids ⁣and employees left the workforce⁤ permanently or reevaluated ⁣their career directions.

The pandemic ⁤hiring boom was followed⁤ by a significant correction in the​ second half of 2022 and the first quarter of this year. Companies,‍ especially ⁢tech‍ firms, culled workforces by hundreds of thousands as ⁤the ‍economy settled and fears of a future ⁤recession⁣ took hold.

But with⁤ unemployment levels still below 4%, employees feel empowered⁢ to demand better ⁣pay and work ‌flexibility ‍as organizations face talent droughts ⁢for vital skillsets.

“As organizations deal ​with all of this, ⁤they are seeking to rebalance power with the available workforce as they pursue strategies for‌ operational efficiency in the wake of rising interest rates,” ‍Chertok said. “Some organizations are eliminating large⁤ swaths of high-risk or redundant roles and hiring back from eliminated trained talent once termination has taken place — Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon all did‍ this.”

The optics around quiet cutting ⁣and its ‍effects⁢ on employee morale is a⁢ big problem, however, and experts ‍argue it’s not worth the perceived cost…

2023-09-20 15:24:03
Original‌ from www.computerworld.com rnrn

Exit mobile version