The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made a landmark ruling on Monday, declaring that Donald Trump is shielded from prosecution for actions taken within his presidential powers.
This ruling extends to any individual holding the position of US president, with the exception being acts carried out in a personal capacity.
While the issue of presidential immunity has surfaced in the past during scandals involving Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, this marks the first instance of a former president facing criminal charges.
The recent decision has postponed the criminal case against Trump in Washington, where he faces allegations related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and his role in inciting the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021. The case will now go back to the lower court for further proceedings.
This ruling signifies a significant development as it establishes that former presidents can be shielded from criminal prosecution.
Trump hailed the decision as a “BIG WIN” on Truth Social, a platform he owns, while President Joe Biden expressed concerns about the precedent set by the ruling. Here is a closer look at the historic 6-3 SCOTUS verdict on immunity:
What is the essence of the Supreme Court’s Trump immunity ruling?
Six out of nine Supreme Court justices, all appointed by Republican presidents, concurred that a president cannot face prosecution for actions falling within their constitutional powers.
The US Constitution grants the president various powers, such as issuing pardons, signing bills, appointing officials, and commanding the military under specific circumstances.
Furthermore, the ruling establishes a presumptive immunity for presidents from criminal prosecution for actions carried out within their official duties.
Post from www.aljazeera.com
