Court hears Victorian council’s online meeting usage clashes with democracy due to conspiracists

Court hears Victorian council’s online meeting usage clashes with democracy due to conspiracists

A Victorian council’s bid to stop ​conspiracists disrupting its work‌ has been ‌challenged in the state’s⁣ supreme court, which heard a “chaotic” meeting led to a planning official being accused of trying to “lock people up”.

Yarra Ranges council,⁤ in Melbourne’s outer ⁢eastern suburbs, announced in April it would close its public gallery for ⁤council meetings citing verbal‌ abuse ‍and intimidation from some ‌of those ‌attending them, including members of the conspiracist group My Place. It reopened its ​meetings to the⁣ public ⁢last month.

Darren Dickson, a‌ critic of the council, who is not⁤ alleged to be a member of the My Place group,⁢ launched legal proceedings⁣ alleging it ⁢failed to meaningfully engage with‌ ratepayers over the design framework for⁤ the small town of Monbulk.

He also alleges the decision to⁢ close the public gallery for Yarra Ranges council meetings prevented⁤ residents from participating ‌in the democratic ‌process.

The new frontline for conspiracy theorists: how‍ Victorian councils were driven⁢ online ⁢to avoid chaosRead more

“It’s actually in conflict with a very fundamental foundation of democracy … being able⁤ to participate in ​government,” Dickson told the⁢ court on Thursday.

Edward ‌Gisonda, a​ barrister ‌representing the council, told the court that the council ​was able​ to close the in-person‍ meetings for security reasons under the ​state’s local government legislation. He said council meetings were still available to the public ‍via online broadcasts.

“The ⁤meeting‌ was never closed,” he‌ told the court.

But Dickson ⁢argued that ​by⁢ only holding meetings online, disadvantaged community members who have challenges ​accessing a⁤ quality ⁢internet connection or cannot ​connect to ⁣the meetings ⁣were‍ being blocked from democratic participation.

He also argued that requiring members of the public ⁤to register was a breach of​ privacy.

But the ⁣council’s⁤ manager of design and place, Nathan Islip, told the court that⁢ he was subjected to verbal abuse ‌at a meeting in January.

He said ​that meeting was shut due to members ‍of the public approaching councillors, and council staff stayed behind to speak to ‌those who attended.

“I approached the front of the ‌chamber to have those‍ conversations and was quickly surrounded by numerous people yelling at me,”‌ he told the hearing, which is being⁤ held ‍online.

“They were yelling insults about⁢ my professional credibility.”

Islip said he felt “unsafe” and described the scenes ‍as “chaotic” before ‌police ⁢arrived to assist.

He said among those that⁢ were there were people who held “conspiracy theories” about ⁢20-minute neighbourhoods – an urban ‍planning concept that aims to ​provide key services within‍ walking distance for residents. Conspiracy theories⁤ have argued it ​is a Trojan horse to put residents in a type of permanent ‌lockdown.

“They ‍were accusing me ⁣of trying⁤ to lock people up,” Islip told⁢ the court.

skip past newsletter promotion

“There was repeated conversations…

2023-08-03 03:21:05
Article from⁤ www.theguardian.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version