Advocates for victims of sexual abuse and court watchdogs are demanding accountability for a New Orleans judge who caused controversy by delaying the trial of a retired Catholic priest accused of child rape and kidnapping on the day of jury selection.
Critics of Judge Benedict Willard have cited his history of angry outbursts during his more than two decades on the bench. The recent incident involving the removal of members from the district attorney’s office during a rape trial has sparked renewed concerns.
During Freddie Sterling’s rape trial in August, Willard allegedly removed a female district attorney’s office employee after a male juror reportedly made inappropriate advances towards her. Instead of addressing the juror’s behavior, Willard labeled the employee as a “distraction” and ordered her removal.
When questioned about his actions by Ned McGowan from the DA’s office, Willard promptly ejected him from court, leading to accusations of cowardice. The tense exchange further escalated when Willard demanded additional deputies to remove McGowan.
Despite subsequent appearances by McGowan in court without incident, tensions flared again during Lawrence Hecker’s highly anticipated trial. Willard accused McGowan once more before recusing himself from the case due to perceived negativity towards his court.
In response to inquiries, Willard declined an interview citing restrictions. Known for his volatile temperament and confrontations with legal professionals and media representatives, critics like Rafael Goyeneche believe that this incident showcases an alarming pattern in Willard’s behavior.
Goyeneche expressed concerns about Judge Willard’s emotional responses interfering with his judicial duties and highlighted this recent episode as particularly egregious among others that have transpired over time.
2024-09-26 05:00:15
Article from www.theguardian.com
