Challenges to Parliamentary Support Service Independence: Marles’ Conflict with Ex-Chief of Staff Raises Concerns

The ongoing ⁤employment conflict involving Richard Marles and his chief of staff, Jo Tarnawsky, has sparked concerns regarding the⁣ autonomy of the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service. This ⁢concern arose when a legal letter was ‍sent to Tarnawsky that included Marles’ perspective.

Upon receiving a letter from Tarnawsky’s lawyer ⁢on ‍June 24, Deputy Prime Minister Marles sought advice from the PWSS, which then enlisted⁤ Ashurst, a prominent law firm based in⁤ Sydney.

In her letter dated June 24, Tarnawsky’s lawyer outlined her ⁣claims of exercising workplace rights and experiencing⁣ adverse actions after attempting to address staff misconduct.⁤ Instead of protection, she alleged being advised ⁣to seek alternative employment.

Two days later on June ⁤26, Ashurst responded on behalf of PWSS stating their engagement by the commonwealth⁢ to ⁢represent them.

The ‍legal correspondence from PWSS informed Tarnawsky that Marles disputed her version of events.

Subsequently, Tarnawsky sought‍ representation from Michael Bradley at Marque Lawyers. Bradley expressed concerns about the perceived lack ‌of independence within PWSS given its involvement in presenting an employer’s stance alongside mediating disputes.

Sussan Ley says Richard Marles should⁣ resign if he failed to‍ provide safe workplace for chief of staffRead more

Bradley stated on behalf‍ of⁢ his client that there appears to be a blurred line between PWSS and the deputy prime minister from their perspective. They feel isolated in this situation.

2024-10-14 22:45:53
Original source www.theguardian.com