Anti-abortion campaigners attempt to end their string of losses

Anti-abortion campaigners attempt to end their string of losses

Anti-abortion campaigners⁢ try to break their losing streak

NESTLED BETWEEN decorative ⁤gourds and halloween ornaments⁢ on suburban⁣ Columbus lawns, signs encourage Ohioans to vote to “protect parents’ rights”. Leaflets declare that mums and dads have “too much to lose”. Only the flyer’s ‍reverse⁤ reveals the‌ threat: not a⁣ woke curriculum or ‌ideas⁣ around gender, but abortion.

On November 7th Ohio will​ become the latest ‌state to vote on adding a right to an abortion to its ‌state constitution. Currently abortion is accessible up to around viability—but only while a six-week ban is litigated in the‍ courts. Six other states ⁣have voted on abortion since⁤ the ⁤Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade last year. In each, voters have opted to ‌protect access, including ‍in conservative states like Kansas and Kentucky. More states are expected to⁤ vote ‍next‌ year, possibly including Arizona, Florida and Missouri. This has given rise to a cottage industry of pollsters and politicos who travel from state to state with each ballot initiative. Ohio‍ is​ the latest testing ground, as anti-abortion campaigners try to break their losing streak.

Rather than sepia-toned images of ‍newborns, teenagers and parents’ rights are⁤ the focus of the campaign. Anti-abortion advocates argue that language in the proposed amendment is so broad⁢ that it could invalidate ⁤Ohio’s law requiring parents’ permission for underage abortions. That seems a stretch, but the anti-abortion campaign is trying to activate ⁢fears around parental rights that have ⁢electrified school-board meetings across the‌ country.

2023-10-19 07:32:02
Article from www.economist.com

Exit mobile version