America narrowly escapes financial catastrophe but remains trapped in fiscal turmoil

America narrowly escapes financial catastrophe but remains trapped in fiscal turmoil



America avoids financial Armageddon but stays in fiscal​ hell

Soap operas must run indefinitely ‍and therefore never conclude satisfactorily. So it is with ​the latest episode of a long-running Washington soap opera—its roughly ⁣biennial ​debt-limit drama—which is⁤ wending towards ​a predictably short-lived conclusion. Having threatened the world ⁣with a sovereign default and financial disaster in‌ order to achieve ⁣their aims, ⁢Republicans in ⁣Congress have gathered modest concessions from President‍ Joe Biden ⁤and agreed that America ought to honour its obligations, after all. The two sides hammered out a deal to raise​ the government’s debt ceiling, which will let it resume borrowing ⁣money—staving off Armageddon for at least the next 18 months. Republican leaders have called the deal, ‌known as the Fiscal Responsibility ‍Act, a historic victory for budgetary prudence.‍ In reality it does nothing⁣ to tackle the main sources of America’s fiscal ​irresponsibility.

This current drama is not ‍fully done yet. On May 31st⁢ the​ deal cleared its toughest hurdle when the House of Representatives approved it ‍by a margin of 314 to 117. It now moves‌ to the Senate, which must pass the bill by June 5th, or Treasury has warned‍ it may run out of cash. ⁤A few conservative senators have​ threatened procedural delays, but ⁢in the end passage seems ⁤assured. Both ​Chuck Schumer, the Democratic majority leader in the Senate, and ⁤Mitch McConnell, the Republican ‌minority ​leader, have come out strongly in favour of the deal. In the ⁢House support was about as bipartisan as⁣ anything​ is these days in Washington, with backing from two-thirds of Republicans⁣ and four-fifths of Democrats.

The headline ⁤summary⁤ of the deal⁣ seems impressive. The ⁤Congressional Budget Office, ‌a neutral scorekeeper, calculates that it will reduce ​spending by‌ about $1.3trn over the next decade. When ⁣cuts are measured in‍ the trillions rather⁢ than the billions,‌ they are, by definition, big. The trouble is that federal spending ‌is⁢ in…

2023-06-01 02:40:22
Post from www.economist.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version