Advance director claims Indigenous voice claim would cause division popular with focus groups at CPAC Australia

Advance director claims Indigenous voice claim would cause division popular with focus groups at CPAC Australia

The director of the⁣ controversial conservative campaign group Advance says the ⁣no campaign aimed to take advantage‍ of voter confusion about the Indigenous voice to parliament, claiming it was able to “shape the conversation” because “very few people” knew about the consultation body.

Matthew Sheahan said the anti-voice group settled on its ‍central argument – that the ‌referendum would cause division – because that theme had been popular ⁢in focus groups. He also‍ took credit for the‌ government getting “caught up”‌ in details of the‌ Uluru statement from⁣ the heart and treaties.

Speaking at CPAC (the⁤ Conservative Political Action⁤ Conference) in Sydney on Saturday, Sheahan said Advance’s strategy was‌ to ⁢win three states to deny the yes campaign its required​ double majority of⁣ a national majority plus four of six states.

Guardian Australia analysis has shown⁢ Advance’s ‍referendum-specific social media pages have focused on Queensland and‌ the smaller-population states of Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania.

Advance is behind Fair⁣ Australia, the main ⁣no campaign ⁣vehicle fronted by the shadow Indigenous Australians minister, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. She⁢ and​ Warren Mundine, CPAC’s chairman, are public faces of the no campaign.

“We did the research and, through the polling and focus groups, it was⁣ clear division was the big factor in people voting⁣ no,” Sheahan said.

“But‍ the big problem, which ⁢we discovered and which we suspected,⁣ was very few people knew about the referendum. But this was an opportunity⁣ as it gave us⁤ a chance to shape the conversation, to​ talk about things like the Uluru statement and treaties, all ⁣on our terms.”

Anthony Albanese’s government ⁣and the Indigenous voice yes campaign have‍ been questioned by voice supporters for not explaining the proposed consultation body in clearer terms at earlier stages of the campaign.

“We’ve‍ had ⁤some great ⁤success,” Sheahan said. ​“A lot of the issues Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ⁣and others have been caught up in have been specifically, strategically brought up​ by Advance.”

The prime minister, speaking to the Labor ⁣national ‍conference in Brisbane on Saturday, called on‌ supporters of the Indigenous voice to parliament “to get out there and‍ campaign like you have never campaigned before”.

“Explain what the clear question is‌ before⁢ the Australian people,” he‍ said.

The yes campaign has‌ become increasingly vocal and critical of the no campaign’s tactics and messaging. Albanese this month claimed no ‍campaigners were “desperate to talk about anything but ​the actual question” ⁢while the Uluru Dialogue co-chair Megan Davis recently accused the ⁣no ⁣campaign of being “intent on misinformation and division”.

In her CPAC speech,⁢ Price told attenders to be “relentless” in their opposition to the ‍voice.

“This is where ‌we as ⁢a​ country draw a line in the sand⁤ and say ‘enough is enough’,” she⁢ said. “Enough ⁢to the gaslighting. Enough with the woke…

2023-08-19 01:19:37
Article from www.theguardian.com
rnrn

Exit mobile version