Lead, microplastics, and coal: Unveiling the Saturday Citations on our polluted planet—also, accelerated lithium-ion battery charging

Lead, microplastics, and coal: Unveiling the Saturday Citations on our polluted planet—also, accelerated lithium-ion battery charging

This week, we reported on new developments in lithium-ion batteries, and ⁤a lithium-ion battery charging”>real industrial pollution hat trick‌ with stories on coal, lead, and ‌microplastics.

In a display of Monday-morning​ quarterbacking of a‌ game that ⁣had actually been played decades before, the Nobel committee awarded the 2019 Nobel ​Prize in​ Chemistry to the developers of the lithium-ion battery, long after the technology had already refashioned the technological face of the planet and like 40 years‍ after Stanley Whittingham first developed his innovative lithium-ion-intercalating cathode. It’s like the ⁢Academy of ⁢Motion ​Picture Arts and Sciences deciding​ in 2023‍ to ​give ‍the award for​ best picture to “Goodfellas.” Too little, too‌ late, AMPAS, ‍nobody will ever forget that “Dances With Wolves” faceplant.

But OK! Now that we’ve⁣ had rechargeable ⁢batteries in literally every device for ‌25 years,⁤ we’ve moved on to the goal of charging up those batteries even faster. Researchers at Huazhong University of ⁢Technology in China have proposed a new, fast-charging battery design that⁣ incorporates a graphite-based material. In tests,‍ the new design sped up the charging time while​ preserving‌ capacity over thousands⁢ of charge cycles. Their breakthrough could conceivably attract attention from Stockholm-based ⁢judges in ⁢as little ‌as​ four decades.

Humans⁢ have ⁢a long ‌historical track record of really messing ‍themselves ⁤up⁢ with lead ‌poisoning, including lead tableware ⁢in ancient ⁣Rome,​ lead-based cosmetics in 18th-century Europe, the‌ globally ⁣widespread use of lead-based paint, and​ the absolute ⁤steroid-popping ⁤granddaddy of ⁢all mass-poisoning​ events, one that ⁣affected the brains and health of everyone on the planet born between 1921 and ⁢1975: ⁣the⁤ burning of leaded gasoline. And⁣ it was for such‌ a hilariously dumb reason—to​ make engines run more quietly.

Well, ‍they phased ⁣out ​leaded gasoline as ⁢the use of catalytic converters in ⁤cars became widespread. Global⁤ atmospheric lead levels dropped, and the generations born after 1985 or‍ so will ⁤likely have two ⁢or three⁢ more IQ points than previous generations. A new study calculates that the elimination of ​airborne​ lead⁢ has resulted in⁢ an average increase in lifetime earnings for U.S. workers of 3.5%,⁤ or $21,400​ for the ⁣average worker. The authors of the study report ​that the‍ total earnings impact of ‍the Clean Air Act is about​ $4.23 trillion and ⁤continues to return ⁤a national dividend of more than 1% each year.

2023-11-25 19:41:03
Post from phys.org

Exit mobile version