It Might Not Be Time to Buy Stocks Yet. This Technical Analyst Sees the Market Going Even Lower.

It Might Not Be Time to Buy Stocks Yet. This Technical Analyst Sees the Market Going Even Lower.


Text measurement

Michael Nagle/Bloomberg

The main U.S. inventory market indexes have misplaced roughly 12% to 25% this yr, a painful setback after two years of good points. Time to purchase? Not so quick, based mostly on a technical evaluation of present market circumstances.

Andrew Addison, a veteran market technician, proprietor of the Institutional View analysis service, and a someday contributor to Barron’s, sees extra draw back forward for the

Dow Jones Industrial Average,
the

S&P 500,
and the

Nasdaq Composite,
given the dearth of shares resisting this yr’s promoting stress.

Unlike basic analysts, who attempt to decide asset worth by learning monetary or financial components, technicians look at chart patterns, and buying and selling quantity and different statistics to establish possible turning factors. “When markets are about to make a meaningful turn, you find that the action in the index is camouflaging strength or weakness beneath the surface,” he says.

At the second, there isn’t a camouflage: Things have been ugly, above and under.

There isn’t any proof that extra shares are reversing their downtrends because the broad indexes fall, he says. Nor has there been a “meaningful contraction” within the variety of shares hitting new lows, or a notable enhance within the proportion of shares buying and selling above their 50-day or 200-day transferring averages. “Until the market’s internals improve, any rallies are likely to be short-lived, like a tropical rainstorm,” he says.

Technical analysts additionally research assist and resistance ranges, factors at which funding demand or provide has stopped selloffs or rallies prior to now. Addison sees assist for the Dow round 29,000 to 30,000; the blue-chip common was round 31,950 on Friday.

Now that the S&P 500 has damaged under 4050, draw back danger is 3800, and doubtlessly 3600, based mostly on his studying of the index’s chart. A decline to 3800 would indicate a lack of 4.8%, based mostly on Friday’s value of 3990.

Addison has spent a whole lot of time learning the

Nasdaq 100,
a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 100 largest nonfinancial firms listed on the Nasdaq, and a proxy for the expansion shares that drove the bull market to dizzying heights. At a latest 11,945, it’s getting near assist, he says. “We could see the Nasdaq 100 start to stabilize around 11,000,” he provides, noting that the index spent about six months, from final June to December, in a buying and selling vary of about 10,500 to 11,000.

The Nasdaq 100’s 200-week transferring common, which defines the long-term buying and selling pattern, sits just under 10,700. The final time the index approached that assist degree was in March 2020, Addison says, when it fell as little as 6770, close to the then-200 week transferring common of 6600. The 200-week transferring averages have supplied assist since shares lifted from their 2009 lows after the monetary disaster. “The major indexes haven’t violated them for the past 13 years,” he says.

If the Nasdaq 100 have been to interrupt under its 200-week transferring common in a decisive method, that would have “earth-shattering consequences” for shares, Addison says.

Haven’t we had sufficient of these already?

Corrections & Amplifications

A drop within the Nasdaq 100 under its 200-week transferring common may have “earth-shattering consequences” for shares, in response to Andrew Addison. An earlier model of this text erroneously referred to a drop under the index’s 200-day transferring common.

Write to Lauren R. Rublin at lauren.rublin@dowjones.com


Exit mobile version