Did we spot an indication of the universe’s first stars? It’s difficult

Did we spot an indication of the universe’s first stars? It’s difficult


A brand new examine casts a haze over a touch of the universe’s first glimmers of starlight.

In 2018, researchers claimed {that a} refined signature in radio waves from early within the universe’s historical past had revealed the period when the primary stars switched on, generally known as the cosmic daybreak. But the primary experiment to check that examine’s conclusions discovered no signal of these early stars, scientists report February 28 in Nature Astronomy.

Just after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years in the past, the universe was a scorching stew of matter. Stars most likely didn’t flicker on till no less than 100 million years later — a poorly understood period of the cosmos. Finding indicators of the primary beams of starlight would flesh out the cosmic origin story. So the 2018 declare of pinpointing these earliest gleams, from the EDGES experiment within the Australian outback, prompted an astronomical hubbub (SN: 2/28/18).

Headlines and summaries of the most recent Science News articles, delivered to your inbox

Thank you for signing up!

There was an issue signing you up.

“It definitely completely excited our whole community with this fascinating result,” says radio astronomer Saurabh Singh of the Raman Research Institute in Bangalore, India.

The researchers reported detecting a dip throughout explicit wavelengths of radio waves, an indication of sunshine from the primary stars interacting with surrounding hydrogen fuel. But the end result rapidly raised skepticism, as a result of the dip was deeper than anticipated. To know whether or not the trace of the primary starlight was actual, scientists would wish to make extra measurements.

Singh and colleagues did simply that with the Shaped Antenna Measurement of the Background Radio Spectrum 3, or SARAS 3. Similar to EDGES, the experiment makes use of an antenna to select up radio waves. But SARAS 3 has a distinct design from EDGES, with a in another way formed antenna. And SARAS 3 is designed to drift atop a lake. “That gives us a very distinctive advantage,” Singh says.

On Earth, radio waves come from a wide range of sources, which have to be fastidiously accounted for to disclose the subtler sign from the cosmic daybreak. Misunderstanding these different sources of radio waves might result in an unaccounted-for experimental error which may give incorrect outcomes.

In explicit, experiments on land should deal with radio waves emitted from the bottom, that are tough to estimate as a result of advanced, layered nature of soil. When the antenna is atop a lake, it’s simpler to estimate what sorts of radio waves come from the uniform water under. Data taken from two lakes in India revealed no signal of the dip.

The new examine “highlights just how difficult this measurement is,” says physicist H. Cynthia Chiang of McGill University in Montreal. It’s uncomfortable that the 2 research disagree, she says, however notes that the disagreement “isn’t quite enough to make any definitive conclusions at this point.”

And among the similar varieties of experimental points that will have an effect on EDGES might additionally have an effect on SARAS 3, says experimental cosmologist Judd Bowman of Arizona State University in Tempe, a member of the EDGES crew. “We still have more work ahead to reach the final outcome.”

An improved model of EDGES might be deployed later this yr, and the SARAS 3 crew has extra deployments deliberate. Other experiments are additionally engaged on comparable measurements. Those exams could lastly illuminate the universe’s transition from darkness to mild.


Exit mobile version